#462: Customers In The Classroom
How college has become transactional, plus how voting has become antagonistic
Happy Thursday, loyal readers. If this is your first issue of Article Club, welcome. I hope you like it here. And if this is your 462nd issue, I hope you’ll stay 462 more.
This week’s issue focuses on two topics — college and voting — and offers a pair of articles for each topic. Remember, I don’t purposely look for selections to juxtapose. But when the stars align, and my reading process points me in this direction, I like the result, because the pieces talk to one another and provoke deeper thought.
If the subject of college intrigues you, consider reading these articles:
If the subject of voting intrigues you, consider reading these articles:
a profile of three women in Georgia on all sides of the voting debate
an analysis of the origin of voter suppression and minority rule
Hope you enjoy this week’s articles. As always, if a piece hits you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Kira!).
⭐️ Especially if you’ve never tried an Article Club discussion, I warmly invite you to join us this month as we delve into “What My Adult Autism Diagnosis Finally Explained.” Written by Mary H.K. Choi and published in The Cut, the article explores the author’s discovery at age 43 that she has autism. Here’s more information about the piece, including my interview with Ms. Choi.
Interested? We’re meeting on Zoom on Sunday, September 29, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. It’d be great to see you there. All you need to do is sign up below. If you have questions, feel free to hit reply or email me here.
1️⃣ Customers In The Classroom
Long ago, college was a place to explore your intellect, discover your passions, expand your horizons, meet new people, and learn for the sake of learning. The point was to make a better society and a better world. Not anymore.
Now college is a transaction. Colleges offer their customers diplomas and experiences to advance their life outcomes, in exchange for large amounts of money. Students choose wisely, pursuing coursework in fields more likely to promise financial freedom. There’s no room for liberal arts classes, no reason to get excited about learning. It’s all about the market.
This article makes plain that any romantic notion of college is only part of the brand. Those quaint photographs of scholars gathering in a circle on the lawn, participating in a seminar seeking truth, facilitated by an inspiring professor? Forget about it. It’s just a show. We’re talking about a capitalist endeavor, after all.
Note: The main link will require you to enter your email address. If you don’t want to, click the gift link. (Gift links are made possible by paid subscribers.)
By Beth McMurtrie • The Chronicle of Higher Education • 21 min • Gift Link
2️⃣ Are Universities Failing the Accommodations Test?
For the last seven years, Simon Lewsen has been teaching writing courses at the University of Toronto. He wants to do a good job, but he can’t wrap his mind around the reality that higher education has shifted significantly since he was a student. Back in the day, professors gave out assignments, and students did them. If a student didn’t take the final examination, too bad for them. It was a simpler time.
Now the expectations have shifted. Mr. Lewsen feels overwhelmed by his email inbox, filled to the brim with requests for accommodations. He has been asked to excuse absences, redesign assignments, provide written notes of missed lectures, accept alternatives to class participation, and of course, extend deadlines.
While Mr. Lewsen appreciates that all students should have access to his classroom, and while he values the guidelines of Universal Design for Learning, he just can’t keep up the pace. And he might not want to, given how little he’s getting paid.
By Simon Lewsen • The Walrus • 21 min • Gift Link
3️⃣ 3 Georgia Women, Caught Up In Suspicion About Voting
Longtime subscribers know that I shy away from choosing articles about politics. My thinking is that you are already bombarded by them. But I simply can’t resist when a piece is exquisitely written, as is most everything by Eli Saslow.
In this article, Mr. Saslow does what he does best: take a heated and intractable issue (in this case, voting rights and election integrity), find real people who care deeply about the issue, and then tell their stories honestly and with empathy.
You’ll meet Helen Strahl, responsible for challenging more than 1,000 voters in Chatham County over the past year and a half. “I’m here to help,” she said. “I’m not here to destroy.” You’ll also meet Sabrina German, director of the Chatham County Board of Registrars. Her staff is responsible for processing Ms. Strahl’s challenges. “Good lord, can we ever catch a break?” she asked. Finally, you’ll meet Carry Smith, who has spent the last 20 years traveling around Georgia, helping register more than 15,000 voters. In this work, she never once thought her own eligibility to vote would be challenged. And she’s not happy when she finds out Ms. Strahl is the challenger.
By Eli Saslow • The New York Times • 12 min • Gift Link
✚ Not only is Mr. Saslow the recipient of two Pulitzer Prizes, he’s also a past participant at Article Club (and subscriber!). Listen to my interview with him about his outstanding piece, “An American Education.” It’s one of my favorites.
4️⃣ Minority Rule Is Threatening American Democracy
Ari Berman: “The founders, despite the lofty ideals in the Declaration of Independence, designed the Constitution in part to check popular majorities and protect the interests of a propertied white upper class. The Senate was created to represent the country’s elite and boost small states while restraining the more democratic House of Representatives. The Electoral College prevented the direct election of the president and enhanced the power of small states and slave states. But as the United States has democratized in the centuries since, extending the vote and many other rights to formerly disenfranchised communities, the antidemocratic features built into the Constitution have become even more pronounced, to the point that they are threatening the survival of representative government in America.
“The timing of our modern retreat from democracy is no coincidence. The nation is now roughly 20 years away from a future in which white people will no longer be the majority. To entrench and hold on to power, a shrinking conservative white minority is relentlessly exploiting the undemocratic elements of America’s political institutions while doubling down on tactics such as voter suppression, election subversion, and the censoring of history. This reactionary movement — which is significantly overrepresented because of the structure of the Electoral College, Congress, and gerrymandered legislative districts — has retreated behind a fortress to stop what it views as the coming siege.”
By Ari Berman • Mother Jones • 18 min • Gift Link
Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀
To our 16 new subscribers — including Leo, Sellami, Orianna, Lily, Savanah, Beth, Alanna, Alisha, Maria, and Madison — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.
If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Jennifer, our latest paid subscriber. Thank you!
If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Katherine!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.
On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.
Also, I just realized the dog in the header is holding a yellow highliter and not a yellow mustard squueze bottle. Duh!
I started the day treating myself to an Article Club read. A treat I often keep for the weekend. Bleak stuff! Yikes. Epecially the pieces about democracy. Well worth reading, but sheesh!
Then I turned to my other fave, the NYT's Well newsletter and a great piece about not falling into the ‘cynicism trap,' and I thought to myself how glad I am that I have AC to keep me grounded and informed about social trends, no matter how depressing, and how your commitment to providing such thought-provoking feelings exemplifies this idea in the cynicism trap article that 'The world isn’t a perfect place, but it isn’t all bad either' because I think you are helping me be a 'hopeful skeptic' who think critically about societal problems while recognizing how kind and generous others really are.'
Reflecting as I often do, on your comments about juxtaposition of articles and common themes.